The US and China, the world’s largest and second-largest economies, have agreed to slash tariffs on each other as they seek to end their trade war.
Speaking after talks with Chinese officials in Geneva, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent told reporters the two sides had reached a deal for a 90-day pause on measures.
US trade representative Jamieson Greer said so-called reciprocal tariffs were now at 10% each.
In real terms, it meant the US is reducing its 145% tariff to 30% on Chinese goods. A tariff of 20% had been implemented on China when President Donald Trump took office, over what his administration said was a failure to stop illegal drugs entering the US.
China has agreed to reduce its 125% retaliatory tariffs to 10% on US goods.
Sector-specific tariffs, such as the 25% tax on cars, aluminium and steel, remain in place.
Money blog: Life as a divorce lawyer
Tariffs, taxes on imports of more than 100%, had been imposed on both sides. China was the only country exempt from a 90-day pause on the “retaliatory” tariffs above the base 10% levies applied by America.
Major retailers had been warning Mr Trump of empty shelves as US importers pause shipments.
Mr Bessent said after a weekend of negotiations in Switzerland, the countries had a mechanism for continued talks.
It’s the second major trade announcement made by the US in the last week, after a deal was secured with the UK on Thursday.
The move signals a willingness from the Americans to make deals on tariffs.
Why Trump blinked in US-China trade war
Of all the fronts in Donald Trump’s trade war, none was as dramatic and economically threatening as the sky-high tariffs he imposed on China.
There are a couple of reasons: first, because China is and was the single biggest importer of goods into the US and, second, because of the sheer height of the tariffs imposed by the White House in recent months.
In short, tariffs of over 100% were tantamount to a total embargo on goods coming from the United States’ main trading partner.
That would have had enormous economic implications, not just for the US but every other country around the world (these are the world’s biggest and second-biggest economies, after all).
So the truce announced on Monday by treasury secretary Scott Bessent is undoubtedly a very big deal indeed.
Welcomed news
The news was received positively by Asian stock markets on Monday as major indexes were up.
In China, the Shanghai Composite stock index rose 0.8%, the Shenzhen Component gained 1.7%, and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index was up nearly 3%.
In countries across Asia, benchmark stock indexes also rose. Korea’s Kospi grew 1.1%, Japan’s Nikkei was up 0.8%, while India’s Nifty 50 index of most valuable companies gained more than 3%.
US stocks look poised to rise on the open, based on after-hours trading. Wall Street’s tech-heavy Nasdaq is expected to rise by 3.3%, and the S&P 500 index of companies relied on to be stable and profitable by 2.5%.
The market rally was visible in Europe, too. France’s CAC 40 is up 1.3%, Germany’s DAX rose 0.5%, and Spain’s IBEX 35 rose 0.5%. The pan-European index, the Stoxx 600 gained 0.9% by Monday afternoon.
What next?
When asked by journalists about what the US wanted to see from China in the 90s, Mr Bessent said, “As long as there is good faith effort, engagement and constructive dialogue, then we will keep moving forward.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Explained: The US-UK trade deal
The UK came to the front of the line for deals, Mr Bessent added, “as our oldest ally”.
Switzerland had also moved to the “front of the queue”, he said, while the EU has been slower.
As with the other counties subject to 90-day pauses, a permanent deal will need to be reached, but confidence across the world is likely to have been boosted.
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
Businesses now need a clear timetable and roadmap for future negotiations under the newly announced economic and trade consultation mechanism, said Andrew Wilson, the deputy secretary general of the International Chamber of Commerce.
“The credibility of that process for resolving underlying frictions in the Sino-US economic relationship will be mission-critical in terms of restoring business confidence.”
