back to top


After a routine Supreme Court argument on Wednesday, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. asked the lawyer who had represented the government to return to the lectern.

“You have just presented your 160th argument before this court, and I understand it is intended to be your last,” the chief justice told the lawyer, Edwin S. Kneedler, who is retiring as a deputy solicitor general. “That is the record for modern times.”

Chief Justice Roberts talked a little more, with affection and high praise, thanking Mr. Kneedler for his “extraordinary care and professionalism.”

Then something remarkable happened. Applause burst out in the courtroom, and that led to a standing ovation for Mr. Kneedler, with the justices joining, too.

“It was a rare moment of unanimity and spontaneous joy from all nine justices on the bench,” said Richard Lazarus, a law professor at Harvard. “They were all beaming.”

Kannon Shanmugam, a veteran Supreme Court lawyer, said it was “one of the most electric moments I’ve ever seen in the courtroom.”

The tribute to Mr. Kneedler’s candor and integrity came against the backdrop of a different kind of courtroom behavior. In the early months of the second Trump administration, its lawyers have been accused of gamesmanship, dishonesty and defiance, and have been fired for providing frank answers to judges.

Mr. Kneedler presented a different model, former colleagues said.

“Ed is the embodiment of the government lawyer ideal — one whose duty of candor to the court and interest in doing justice, not just winning a case, always carried the day,” said Gregory G. Garre, who served as solicitor general under President George W. Bush.

Mr. Shanmugam said Mr. Kneedler’s loyalty was to the rule of law. “He would much rather get the law right at the risk of losing,” Mr. Shanmugam said, “than win at the cost of misrepresenting the law.”

Seth P. Waxman, who was solicitor general in the Clinton administration, said Mr. Kneedler was the opposite of a partisan.

“In all the years that I worked with Ed in the Justice Department, I did not know his politics,” Mr. Waxman said.

Mr. Kneedler joined the Office of the Solicitor General, the elite unit of the Justice Department that represents the federal government in the Supreme Court, in 1979, served in many administrations and helped tutor the solicitors general who came and went.

“I was incredibly lucky to have Ed as a deputy when I was S.G.,” Justice Elena Kagan, who served as solicitor general in the Obama administration, said in a statement. “There’s pretty much no legal question he can’t answer. And he has a bone-deep understanding of the traditions and ethos of the S.G.’s office.”

She added: “I learned from him every day, and I did my job far better because he was there. In all the time I’ve spent in government, I’ve never known a finer public servant.”

That was something like a consensus view among former solicitors general. Mr. Waxman, for instance, called Mr. Kneedler “a national treasure.”

Noel J. Francisco, the solicitor general in the first Trump administration, said that Mr. Kneedler was “not just a font of knowledge, but of wisdom.”

Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the solicitor general in the Biden administration, said that “Ed Kneedler represents the very best of what it means to be a lawyer for the United States.”

Mr. Kneedler’s retirement is part of a wave of departures from the solicitor general’s office, which is quite small. After the solicitor general and a handful of deputies, there are just 16 line lawyers. About half of them are leaving, The Washington Post reported this month.

Mr. Kneedler, 79, did not respond to requests for an interview. When he received an award this month from the University of Virginia’s law school, his alma mater, he said he was “a career civil servant, not in the press if I can avoid it.”

At the ceremony, Mr. Kneedler gave extended remarks, making points that in another era might have seemed unremarkable. These days, they verged on provocative.

Calling himself a “citizen lawyer,” he praised the many federal employees he had worked with, saying he had been impressed by their “compassion and understanding for our country, and dedication to our country.”

He said his office analyzed legal issues with rigor and care, at least in cases on the court’s regular docket. Since Mr. Trump took office in January, the government has filed a torrent of emergency applications on what critics call the court’s shadow docket.

“When we don’t have emergencies like we have a number of now,” Mr. Kneedler said, “we have a very structured decision-making process.”

Leslie Kendrick, the Virginia law school’s dean, asked Mr. Kneedler a few questions, one of which was premised on his office’s “commitment to providing nonpartisan representation for the United States, regardless of cause, regardless of the political leadership of the other two branches.”

Mr. Kneedler did not quite adopt the premise. “We are lawyers for the United States,” he said, “and the administration in office is the ultimate determiner of what the interests of the United States are.”

But he ended his remarks on a hopeful note. “We’re all part of a process that is leading us to a more perfect union,” he said, “which means a union in which we are coming together, not apart.”

Before the standing ovation at the Supreme Court on Wednesday, Chief Justice Roberts, himself a veteran of the solicitor general’s office, added what he called a personal note as he spoke to Mr. Kneedler.

“I recall that on two occasions you and I argued on the same side here, me representing a private client and you the United States,” the chief justice said. “We lost each of those cases. I’m sure it was my fault. Mr. Kneedler, thank you for your outstanding service to court and country.”

Shannon Sharpe reveals NFL Draft plans with ‘legends’ despite shocking rape claims intensifying

Share post:


Under-fire Shannon Sharpe has revealed his intentions to attend the NFL Draft in Green Bay Thursday night, despite the drama surrounding his bombshell rape lawsuit continuing to intensify. 

The 56-year-old is being sued by one of his ex-girlfriends for $50million over claims he repeatedly raped her during the relationship – allegations he vehemently denies after countering that she is merely trying to score a major financial settlement.

Yet, despite skipping ESPN’s First Take show Wednesday morning amid the shocking allegations, the former tight end still plans to show his face at Lambeau Field on Thursday to join Chad Ochocinco to co-host a draft night special of their podcast, ‘Nightcap.’ 

Sharpe and Ochocinco are set to interview NFL legends and new draftees throughout the first round of the draft during a live broadcast of their show, the podcast announced on Instagram on Wednesday.

Since news of the lawsuit first broke on Monday, both the Super Bowl winner and the accuser’s respective attorneys have brought shocking new evidence to light over the past 48 hours, including a text which shows her telling him ‘no means no’ after an alleged rape in January.

Audio footage provided to the Daily Mail Tuesday also captures him threatening to choke the woman who is now suing him, which his lawyer has claimed was ‘in the heat of the moment’ while insisting the violent threat was ‘not intended.’

Under-fire Shannon Sharpe has revealed his intentions to attend the NFL Draft Thursday

The former tight end is set to be at Lambeau Field in Green Bay for the first round of the draft 

Sharpe will co-host a draft night special of his podcast with Chad Ochocinco (pictured) 

The accuser claims she was abused by Sharpe over the course of their near one-year relationship, which began when she was 20 and he was 53 back in 2023.

The first alleged rape is said to have taken place in October of last year, with the lawsuit claiming he forced himself on her as she ‘was crying and sobbing.’ Sharpe is accused of raping her again in January after arriving at her home with promises of Christmas and birthday gifts.

In an alleged text exchange between the two parties in January – which was provided to the Daily Mail on Tuesday by Shannon’s attorney Lanny J. Davis, who claims they show ‘a pattern of sexual role-playing’ initiated by the accuser – the woman in question confronts him for forcing himself upon her without consent.

According to files released by the defense team, her bombshell message on January 2, 2025, said: ‘I cried when u left because I begged you to put a condom on and not put it in my a** and u didn’t listen. I don’t care what our history is, no means no shannon.’

‘Idk [I don’t know] how to process this,’ she added.

The evening prior, the accuser – who is believed to be in her 20s – allegedly text Sharpe demanding he made a payment to her, which she appeared to suggest had previously been promised.

Plaintiff attorney Tony Buzbee released a second recorded phone call, purportedly between Sharpe and his now-ex. And just like the previous tape, which Sharpe’s attorney described as both authentic and misleading, the 56-year-old is again heard sharing his plans to choke his partner.

Significantly, the date of the recording is unknown and much of the context around the conversation remains unclear.

Sharpe broke his silence on the suit in a pre-recorded video statement on Instagram Tuesday

‘I’m not really interested in getting choked,’ the woman is heard saying in the tape recording first published by TMZ.

‘I may choke you in public,’ a man’s voice, believed to Sharpe’s, is said heard saying. ‘Big black guy chokes small white woman.’

The woman responded after a brief pause: ‘It’s not a good look, Shannon.’

‘Not a good look that you did what the s*** you did to me,’ the man’s voice fired back, although it’s difficult to say what he was referring to.

DailyMail.com has reached out to Sharpe’s attorney, Davis, and Buzbee for further details.

The tape is eerily similar to the other call previously released by Buzbee’s office to DailyMail.com in which Sharpe is heard saying: ‘I’m gonna f***ing choke the s*** out of you when I see you.’

Davis has confirmed the authenticity of that recording, but claimed his client was speaking ‘in the heat of the moment’ and the violent threat was ‘not intended.’

Doe allegedly tried to pull away from Sharpe after he livestreamed a sexual encounter with another women – something he claims he did ‘on accident.’ But she claims Sharpe became irate.

‘On October 6, 2024, Plaintiff was working out at a Nevada gym, following her usual routine,’ the filing read. ‘As she worked out, she saw Sharpe aggressively approaching her. She could tell by his look and the way he moved quickly towards her that he was furious for having been ignored.

‘As soon as he got close, he told her, ”Sit the f*** down or I’m going to kill you,”’ the filing continued. ‘Plaintiff refused. ”I don’t want to talk to you. You cheated on me.”

‘His response was dismissive and controlling as usual. ”You don’t have a choice.”’



Exit mobile version