.
For years, Pakistan exercised restraint in dealing with the authorities in Afghanistan. It relied on backchannel diplomacy, intelligence sharing and border fencing to contain the threat posed by the banned TTP. But the recent wave of high-profile terrorist attacks inside Pakistan appears to have altered Islamabad’s calculus decisively.
In an unprecedented move, Pakistan conducted massive air strikes deep inside the Afghan territory, targeting what it described as Taliban military bases used to facilitate cross-border terrorist attacks. The strikes, in response to the Afghan Taliban’s simultaneous attacks on Pakistan army checkposts, hit multiple locations, including Kabul, Kandahar, Nangarhar and Khost. Never before has Pakistan struck at such scale and depth inside Afghanistan.
The message is unmistakable: the era of patience is over. At the heart of the escalating tensions lies the TTP issue. The TTP, ideologically aligned with the Afghan Taliban, has found safe haven across the border. Since the Taliban takeover, the group has regrouped, rearmed and reorganised, launching increasingly sophisticated attacks inside Pakistan.
Efforts at reconciliation have failed. Pakistan even tried negotiations with the TTP under Taliban mediation, but the ceasefire collapsed. The result: a surge in violence that has tested public patience and forced policymakers to rethink their approach.
The air strikes targeting the Afghan Taliban military bases signal a doctrinal shift. Pakistan is no longer content with defensive posturing or reactive measures along the border. Instead, it has adopted a strategy of punitive deterrence, degrading the infrastructure that enables cross-border terrorism.
By hitting what it said are Taliban military facilities and training hubs, Pakistan seeks to raise the cost of supporting the TTP. The objective is not symbolic retaliation but strategic degradation. Islamabad wants to disrupt command-and-control networks, destroy logistics pipelines and send a clear signal that Afghan soil cannot be used as a sanctuary.
Equally significant is the rhetorical escalation. Senior Pakistani officials have branded the Taliban a “master proxy”, something that marks a dramatic departure from past language. This is not merely a security dispute, but an open political indictment of the regime in Kabul.
Perhaps the most telling aspect of this episode is the muted international reaction. There has been no significant condemnation from major powers. On the contrary, both the US and the EU have reiterated Pakistan’s right to self-defence in the face of cross-border terrorist attacks. This diplomatic space matters. It indicates that Islamabad’s narrative that it is acting against internationally recognised terrorist entities has found resonance. The absence of global pushback suggests that the Taliban regime’s diplomatic isolation continues to limit its leverage.
While the stated aim is to neutralise the TTP threat, the broader strategic objective appears more ambitious. By escalating militarily and politically, Pakistan may be seeking to fundamentally alter the balance of power inside Afghanistan. Degrading Taliban infrastructure, increasing military pressure and isolating the regime diplomatically could serve a larger purpose: weakening the Taliban’s grip on power. If the current trajectory continues, Pakistan’s ultimate objective may extend beyond counterterrorism to regime recalibration or even regime change.
Reconciliation with the current dispensation in Kabul increasingly seems out of the window. The trust deficit is too deep, the violence too frequent and the rhetoric too sharp. Pakistan’s new Afghanistan doctrine is clear: if Kabul cannot or will not act against the TTP, Islamabad will. And it will do so with force.
The stakes are high. Escalation carries risks of broader conflict. Yet from Islamabad’s vantage point, inaction carries a greater cost. The coming months will determine whether this strategy compels behavioural change in Kabul or ushers in a new and more dangerous phase in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations.
