back to top


After a routine Supreme Court argument on Wednesday, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. asked the lawyer who had represented the government to return to the lectern.

“You have just presented your 160th argument before this court, and I understand it is intended to be your last,” the chief justice told the lawyer, Edwin S. Kneedler, who is retiring as a deputy solicitor general. “That is the record for modern times.”

Chief Justice Roberts talked a little more, with affection and high praise, thanking Mr. Kneedler for his “extraordinary care and professionalism.”

Then something remarkable happened. Applause burst out in the courtroom, and that led to a standing ovation for Mr. Kneedler, with the justices joining, too.

“It was a rare moment of unanimity and spontaneous joy from all nine justices on the bench,” said Richard Lazarus, a law professor at Harvard. “They were all beaming.”

Kannon Shanmugam, a veteran Supreme Court lawyer, said it was “one of the most electric moments I’ve ever seen in the courtroom.”

The tribute to Mr. Kneedler’s candor and integrity came against the backdrop of a different kind of courtroom behavior. In the early months of the second Trump administration, its lawyers have been accused of gamesmanship, dishonesty and defiance, and have been fired for providing frank answers to judges.

Mr. Kneedler presented a different model, former colleagues said.

“Ed is the embodiment of the government lawyer ideal — one whose duty of candor to the court and interest in doing justice, not just winning a case, always carried the day,” said Gregory G. Garre, who served as solicitor general under President George W. Bush.

Mr. Shanmugam said Mr. Kneedler’s loyalty was to the rule of law. “He would much rather get the law right at the risk of losing,” Mr. Shanmugam said, “than win at the cost of misrepresenting the law.”

Seth P. Waxman, who was solicitor general in the Clinton administration, said Mr. Kneedler was the opposite of a partisan.

“In all the years that I worked with Ed in the Justice Department, I did not know his politics,” Mr. Waxman said.

Mr. Kneedler joined the Office of the Solicitor General, the elite unit of the Justice Department that represents the federal government in the Supreme Court, in 1979, served in many administrations and helped tutor the solicitors general who came and went.

“I was incredibly lucky to have Ed as a deputy when I was S.G.,” Justice Elena Kagan, who served as solicitor general in the Obama administration, said in a statement. “There’s pretty much no legal question he can’t answer. And he has a bone-deep understanding of the traditions and ethos of the S.G.’s office.”

She added: “I learned from him every day, and I did my job far better because he was there. In all the time I’ve spent in government, I’ve never known a finer public servant.”

That was something like a consensus view among former solicitors general. Mr. Waxman, for instance, called Mr. Kneedler “a national treasure.”

Noel J. Francisco, the solicitor general in the first Trump administration, said that Mr. Kneedler was “not just a font of knowledge, but of wisdom.”

Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the solicitor general in the Biden administration, said that “Ed Kneedler represents the very best of what it means to be a lawyer for the United States.”

Mr. Kneedler’s retirement is part of a wave of departures from the solicitor general’s office, which is quite small. After the solicitor general and a handful of deputies, there are just 16 line lawyers. About half of them are leaving, The Washington Post reported this month.

Mr. Kneedler, 79, did not respond to requests for an interview. When he received an award this month from the University of Virginia’s law school, his alma mater, he said he was “a career civil servant, not in the press if I can avoid it.”

At the ceremony, Mr. Kneedler gave extended remarks, making points that in another era might have seemed unremarkable. These days, they verged on provocative.

Calling himself a “citizen lawyer,” he praised the many federal employees he had worked with, saying he had been impressed by their “compassion and understanding for our country, and dedication to our country.”

He said his office analyzed legal issues with rigor and care, at least in cases on the court’s regular docket. Since Mr. Trump took office in January, the government has filed a torrent of emergency applications on what critics call the court’s shadow docket.

“When we don’t have emergencies like we have a number of now,” Mr. Kneedler said, “we have a very structured decision-making process.”

Leslie Kendrick, the Virginia law school’s dean, asked Mr. Kneedler a few questions, one of which was premised on his office’s “commitment to providing nonpartisan representation for the United States, regardless of cause, regardless of the political leadership of the other two branches.”

Mr. Kneedler did not quite adopt the premise. “We are lawyers for the United States,” he said, “and the administration in office is the ultimate determiner of what the interests of the United States are.”

But he ended his remarks on a hopeful note. “We’re all part of a process that is leading us to a more perfect union,” he said, “which means a union in which we are coming together, not apart.”

Before the standing ovation at the Supreme Court on Wednesday, Chief Justice Roberts, himself a veteran of the solicitor general’s office, added what he called a personal note as he spoke to Mr. Kneedler.

“I recall that on two occasions you and I argued on the same side here, me representing a private client and you the United States,” the chief justice said. “We lost each of those cases. I’m sure it was my fault. Mr. Kneedler, thank you for your outstanding service to court and country.”

Huge setback for ultra-violent new Australian sport that has been endorsed by NRL and AFL stars

Share post:


An ultra-violent Australian sport which has been endorsed by several prominent figures in the NRL and AFL has suffered a big blow after one of its events in New Zealand was called off.

‘Run It Straight’ is a new and emerging competition which challenges two competitors to sprint straight at each other and compete in full-contact collisions.

The objective is to either plough over an opposition tackler while running with a football or successfully tackle a ball carrier to the ground.

Competitors are generally seen wearing very minimal protective gear, with brutal impacts occuring as a result.

A ‘Run It Straight’ event, which is said to be organised by @RunItStraight24, had been scheduled at Williams Park Mangere in Auckland on Wednesday.

However, the event has been scrubbed by organisers after they failed to secure a permit to host the event.

An ultra-violent Australian sport that requires two competitors to run head on into each other has suffered a big blow

Run It Straight were due to host an event in Auckland but they have failed to gain permission to host the event 

A local board had also opposed the event after citing safety fears, claiming that the new sport could lead to brain injuries.

The chairman of the Mangere-Otahuhu local board, Tauanu’u Nick Bakulich, said to Democracy Reporting that no application had been made to the Auckland Council to host the event.

‘An event was scheduled at Williams Park Māngere [on Wednesday]. The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board opposes this event for reasons of safety, given what data is available as a result of brain and health-related injuries,’ Bakulich said.

‘This event did not apply for an approved permit from the Auckland Council, nor a parks booking through the Auckland Council process. This event will now not take place at Williams Park, Māngere.’

Auckland Council confirmed that no applications to host the event in the park had been received.

Though, while no application was given to Auckland Council, a spokesperson told the New Zealand Herald that it would have likely declined the request.

‘If the organisers were to follow the correct process, we believe it is highly unlikely the event would have met the council’s guidelines for approval,’ a spokesperson said.

‘For clarity, the council has not received an application for a permit nor a booking for the ground and therefore cannot comment on this event,’ Eli Nathan, Auckland Council’s head of area operations added.

He stated permits are necessary for events that will host more than 150 people. Events that also involve safety risks or the use of power, food vendors or vehicles are also required to have a permit.

Meanwhile, Run It Straight’s founder Christian Lesa, also known as Charizma, 

‘You see a lot of stuff online, I think they take little flicks and run with it online and run with that narrative,’  

‘But when you’re there and the community is out – they loved it. I’d say there’s not many events that bring the community together. Obviously, it’s a full-contact sporting event but to see them there and loving it as much as I do, it means a lot to me. 

‘Having local businesses come through, they all sold out. That’s another thing that fills my heart.’

He added: ‘Obviously, the dream is to take it world wide and across all countries and that but it just depends on the backlash we get.’ 

It comes after a different run it straight championship, called RUNIT, was also held this week in Auckland, with another event planned in New Zealand on May 25.

The RUNIT Championships had also recently been held in Melbourne and saw former NRL star George Burgess and ex-international rugby union player Nemani Nadolo to compete at the event.

It comes after a different run it straight event, called RUNIT, was also held this week in Auckland

The sport challenges competitors to run head-first into eachother, with brutal collisions occuring as a result 

NRL star, Nelson Asofa-Solomona and AFL player Jamarra Ugle-Hagan have both appeared to endorse the RUNIT Championships in the past.

Asofa-Solomona has, after appearing in several pictures published on the league’s social media, withdrawn his affiliation to the league.

Meanwhile, Ugle-Hagan, who is currently taking a leave of absence away from the Western Bulldogs to deal with some personal issues, was also seen at this month’s RUNIT event in Melbourne.

The sport has gained huge popularity around the world already but has been scrutinised by some health experts, who were ‘gobsmacked’ by the sport, especially considering how many retired sports stars are reporting with brain injuries following their careers.

An Australian sports neuroscientist, Dr Alan Pearce, said he was baffled by why people would take the risk.

“I was pretty gobsmacked, speechless actually when I saw this competition idea starting because for me as someone who has seen hundreds of footballers and rugby league players who are now struggling with brain injury and long-term impairment it is really troubling,” Dr Pearce told news.com.au.

“I just cannot understand how they could take the most violent aspect of sport and just turn it into a spectacle where the objective is just to try and knock out or hurt your opponent.

George Burgess (right) is one former NRL player who has endorsed the new sport (pictured with Nemani Nadolo) 

But some have expressed safety concerns, with competitors wearing minimal protective gear

“In a lot of these other sports (such as NRL, AFL and rugby union) you’re trying to avoid direct contact whereas this is purely running at each other, it’s insanity.”

However, former NRL star George Burgess has come out to defend the event.

‘Every sport that we have in our society is to remind us of our warrior past and to simulate warfare in a safe way – and that’s exactly what we do,’ Burgess said.

While safety concerns have been raised by the new sport, RUNIT say they take a range of safety precautions to reduce the risk competitors are faced with.

‘We’ve got an ambulance on site… We’ve got liability. Everything’s covered,’ RUNIT safety spokesperson Billy Coffey told RNZ.

‘There’s waivers, medicals beforehand, medicals after. There’s an ambulance on site.’

‘These guys, they’re born warriors, they want to do this and they’re stuck at home, have to retire early.

‘Just because of that financial crisis, they’re stuck in two jobs because maybe their partner or wife or whoever’s staying at home can’t afford to send [their children to] a daycare or doesn’t want to and wants to spend more time with the family, and this gives these people a chance to get off off the couch, find that fire again in front of their friends and family and relive it.’

Exit mobile version